Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« Huawei to US: Some day soon you'll be begging to buy our gear | Main | Huawei & ZTE top China's modest software sector »
Friday
Sep302011

SARFT plots $32b cable network to take on telcos

An update on China’s telecom vs. cable saga.

The Economic Observer reports that State Council is weighing a plan from SARFT proposing a national cable company with 200 billion yuan ($32bn) in network and content assets.

It’s the second attempt this year by the broadcast regulator at creating a nationwide cable giant.

The first plan, calling for a state-owned company comprising all provincial level network assets, was rejected because it was not under the control of asset regulator SASAC as large SOEs are supposed to be.

The current modest proposal puts the company under SASAC, but retains a role for SARFT as content regulator.

The new firm would seek an initial 10 billion yuan investment from the central government, aiming to build a company structure which could progressively soak up the provincial assets.

It’s the latest in a long and so-far fruitless saga. SARFT, the government and successive telecom ministries have been butting heads over this since the late 1990s.

Early last year State Council ordered the ministries to break the logjam, but aside from a handful of trials, some resulting in legal action, little has happened since.

Even if the turf war could be solved, the practical difficulties of creating a national cable firm are immense. The dozens of network operators each use their own technology standards and many of them have high levels of debt.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>