Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« Mobile industry in denial over roaming | Main | Huawei MBBF notes & highlights »
Monday
Nov092015

Military pundit calls on China to blow up US subsea cables

A Chinese military commentator has called on the PLA to target US subsea cables in response to US Navy operations in the South China Sea.

A column on ifeng.com, one of China’s most popular news sites, says China should attach explosives to “core US military and business cables” to drive the US out of Asia.

The writer, who goes by the name of Liu Chang, said China should follow the example of Russia. whose spy ships have become active near US subsea assets, according to a recent New York Times report.

This highlighted the significance to the US "of the humble submarine cable," the writer says.

Facing the US intrusion into China sovereignty in the South China Sea, China could also reference the Russian approach. Whether it’s Russia on this occasion or China in the future tapping or damaging the US cables, none of this in any way makes the US a victim. 

This is because of a number of alleged incidents of US submarines tapping into Chinese cables, beginning "early in the Cold War," Liu claims. It's worth noting that US submarine installed a surveillance device on a cable until the Halibut in the Sea of Okhotsk in 1971.  Liu suggests that US participation in the search for the missing MH370 jet in 2014 was also aimed at surveilling China's submarine cable systems.

The writer adds that while it would be “certainly good” to acquire intelligence by monitoring a US cable, "the major task is to detect US core or military use cable locations."

Through the use of navy submarines [China can] release miniature underwater vehicles (UVs) ... to install explosive devices. When needed, this can deliver a devastating blow to US cables.

Liu doesn’t offer advice on how to differentiate “US” cables from those carrying Chinese traffic, or Japanese or Singapore traffic for that matter, and is equally unaware that the US has no military subsea cables in the west Pacific.

It is easy to dismiss him as a Chinese version of the kind of uber-hawks that make up the Fox News commentary team, but ifeng is a hugely popular portal, the website for the successful Phoenix TV channel, and Liu Chang and his unchallenged disinformation reflect some widely-held assumptions about China and its entitlements.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>