Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« China handset firms accuse Qualcomm | Main | 21Vianet still on starting line in HK »
Monday
Feb102014

What part of 'virtual' don't they get?

An unusual story crossed the wires at Sina Tech on Saturday, reporting that China's new MVNO licensees are not permitted to build network infrastructure.

The natural response might be: what part of 'virtual' don't they understand?

However, the story suggests some of China's new MVNO licensees may have harboured hopes that they might be allowed to actually own their own kit.  In much of China’s indifferently regulated business environment, that’s a fair assumption.

Without naming any companies, it says “some internet firms [had] hoped to have their own network infrastructure.”  The first batch of MVNO licensees, announced in December, included subsidiaries of internet giant Alibaba and online mall JD.com.

These are politically savvy companies. Did someone in the MIIT really suggest that they might be able to own pieces of the network? A common-sense respone would be that with just three telcos and a clutch of provincial cable guys providing infrastructure for a bandwidth-hungry fifth of humanity, private network investment would be a no-brainer.

This being China, it’s forbidden. Yet talk of economic reform is in the air. So, while most likely this is merely a story confirming what was expected, just maybe it suggests there are thoughts of allowing private players to build and operate small parts of the network.

Still on MVNOs, the MIIT has handed out another eight MVNO licences, this time including heavyweight electronics retailers Suning and Gome (in English here).

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>