Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« ZTE: New branding, same prospects | Main | China commits to private broadband, with limits »
Thursday
Dec112014

Innovating the city

You could make a case for the elevator being responsible for the modern world.

It's certainly enabled the modern city. But for Elisha Otis' 'safety elevator' 160 years ago, we'd still be living in three-storey walkups and cities – not to mention economies - would be much smaller than today.

On its way out? Elevator core in Aurora building, Taipei.

It was a simple and extremely robust technology. Not unlike the telephone, another late 19th century innovation, the elevator continued without any fundamental change for a hundred years. Even today's lifts are based on Otis' concept.

The one big change in has been to add smarts to allocate lifts in large building to riders in the most efficient way. The inventor of destination control, as it's known, Schindler’s research chief Paul Friedli, was in Hong Kong for the Innovation Summit last week, this time hawking the idea of smartphone-controlled elevators.

OK, there's an app for that, you might be thinking. But Friedli and his team figured out pretty quickly that this is more than just another piece of software on your phone screen. Once you untether people from the elevator call button you also make redundant the last 150 years of urban building design. You no longer need a bundle of steel and glass around an elevator core. You can even separate the 'elevator' from the building.

Now you're talking about not reinventing the building, but the entire urban environment. Schindler's concept designs, showed to media last week, include buildings that hang from spiral structures and environments that are horizontal, not vertical, and that create rather than consume green space.

These ideas matter because we are in the middle of one of the great shifts in human history. Billions are moving from the countryside to the city in India, China and elsewhere. The chances are high they will live in a ghetto. A billion people live in slums today, and this is forecast to double by 2030. If they are lucky enough to find housing, it will be in a vertical stack of energy-guzzling apartments surrounded by hundreds of others.

So, an innovation challenge. Governments like to talk of innovation as an industry policy that will create jobs. And cities are defined by their forests of banal skyscrapers. But if anything demands innovation - that is, fresh thinking to come up with the best and most feasible solutions - it is this.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>