Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« Solving the WeChat problem | Main | Latest: China Mobile's war on WeChat »
Monday
Apr012013

WeChat fee 'likely', says MIIT chief 

China’s telecom regulator has confirmed it is planning to impose a fee on the free OTT app WeChat.

Miao Wei, the head of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, told the financial publication Caixin Sunday that the demands by operators for the fee were “very reasonable” and it was “likely” to go ahead.

“The operators say ‘I maintain such a huge network, [but] I still need to invest and to operate. Apart from traffic [fees] there still should be these kinds of charges – that is sensible and reasonable,” Miao said.

Miao’s remarks follow weeks of speculation over the fee, which was reportedly discussed at a meeting between WeChat operator Tencent, the MIIT and operators in February.

But paid WeChat is a long from being a done deal. Miao and the three unloved state-owned operators will need to overcome opposition from WeChat’s 300 million users, not to mention 1.1 billion mobile consumers long disenchanted over pricing and services.

“The WeChat fee will become the most serious battle so far over China’s internet,” Chinese web entrepreneur Fang Xingdong today declared on Sina Weibo.

To win the argument Miao will have to do better than to merely claim that WeChat was “certainly not free” because users are already charged for bandwidth.  Consumers will be asking why they need to pay again if the bandwidth was already paid for.  

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>