Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« Why China Mobile needs the iPhone | Main | Greedy developers holding back China fibre rollout »
Tuesday
May292012

Is the EU really going to take on China?

The other shoe has been slow to drop since the Financial Times reported that the European Union was preparing a major WTO case against Huawei and ZTE.

That’s not so unusual. China usually takes a couple of days to figure out its response in such sensitive issues. Then it fires with all barrels.

Yet while the FT says the EU could bring a formal case as soon as next month, I’m not completely convinced this isn’t a kite-flying exercise.

Apart from being highly politicised, and sure to invite Beijing retribution, the EU went through all this in its investigation into the dumping of Chinese modems 18 months ago.

It dropped that at the request of the complainant, Belgian firm Option, but in a subsequent confidential report it concluded that vendors enjoyed “massive” state support. Yet it did nothing.

This time around, the EC has “very solid evidence” that the two firms “benefited from illegal government subsidies and had sold products in the EU below cost,” the FT says.

This time around the EU is also in the middle of an existential financial crisis. It begged some cash from Beijing a few months ago. It isn't hard to imagine the conversations taking place in Brussels and Beijing right now.

For what it’s worth, Huawei has issued an email saying it has not received any advice about an investigation and denying that it has received any illegal subsidies.

If the inquiry does go ahead, it wouldn't be the worst thing that could happen to Chinese vendors, or China for that matter. It would establish the nature and extent of Chinese state aid and set some clear red lines.

It's often forgotten - especially by Chinese officials - that one of the reasons that China joined the WTO in 1999 was to impose market disciplines on its economy. Here's a chance to do that.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>