Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« 21 Vianet cleared for HK spectrum race | Main | Apple halts China 4S sales after melee at Beijing store »
Thursday
Jan192012

Reliance's ambitious FLAG IPO plan

Heavily-geared Indian telco Reliance Communications is no longer trying to selll off its enterprise group and instead is looking to lists its subsea cable business.

It’s reportedly planning to raise $1.5bn by selling up to 75% of the group as a business trust on the Singapore Stock Exchange.

Without being able to know all the numbers, that seems ambitious.

PCCW’s Richard Li raised $1.2 bn from the sale of its fixed and mobile telecom operations in Singapore in November.

It was the first telecom IPO in Asia to use the business trust model, which is a combination of unit trust and traditional equities. It’s controversial in that it allows the vendor to keep control with as little as 25% ownership.

That of course makes it more attractive to RCom, which is carrying $5.5 billion in debt, but in contrast to PCCW’s growing consumer telecom business, FLAG merely flogs bits on cables at steadily declining prices; it’s been a long time since a subsea carrier went public.

FLAG has some history. It was the world’s first global cable system, costing around $3.5 billion to build, covering trans-Atlantic, regional Asia and later India-Europe. It opened for business in 1997, crashed with the bubble and was picked up by Reliance for $207mn in 2004.

It’s now a part of Reliance Globalcom, RCom’s domestic and global wholesale and enterprise business unit.

RCom doesn't break out any of its figures on the capacity business, but the Globalcom unit reported ebitda of $113mn on gross sales of $464mn in the September quarter.

Reliance says it has beefed up FLAG by increasing capacity by “400 times” and by joining new cables like the new 15Tbps Singapore-Japan link.

The IPO plan follows an unsuccessful attempt to sell Reliance Globalcom for $3 billion two years ago. RCom denied the reports at the time, but industry executives described it as an “open secret”.

UPDATE: Eric Handa from consultancy and voice speicalist AP Telecom, says he believes that the billion dollar-plus valuation will be "elusive".

"Many of the assets on the Atlantic -FA-1 and Pan-Asia - FNAL have a limited lifespan of IRU capability left. The original purchase price was $200m as well something closer to a multiple of times four is more reasonable... valuation is in the eyes of the beholder and ultimately the market will bear the true test".

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>