Navigation
21Vianet 2600Hz 3Com 3GPP 3Leaf 4G 4G licensing 5G Africa Alcatel Shanghai Bell Alcatel-Lucent Alibaba Android antiitrust Apple APT Satellite Arete AT&T auction backbone Baidu Bain bandwidth base station Battery broadband cable CBN CCP censorship Cfius China China brands China FTTH China hi-tech China market China media China Mobile China Mobile Hong Kong China Science China Telecom China Unicom chips Ciena Cisco civil society CNNIC Communist Party convergence copyright CSL cybersecurity Datang drones Egypt Elop Ericsson EU Facebook FDD LTE FDD-LTE feature phones Fiberhome FLAG forecasts Foxconn FTZ Galaxy S3 Google GSMA GTI handset handsets Hisilicon HKBN HKIX HKT HKTV Hong Kong HTC Huawei Hugh Bradlow Hutchison India Infinera Innovation Intel internet investment iOS iPad iPad 2 iPhone IPv6 ITU Japan KDDI KT labour shortage Leadcore low-cost smartphone LTE MAC MAE Mandiant market access Mediatek Meego Miao Wei Microsoft MIIT mobile broadband mobile cloud mobile data mobile security mobile spam mobile TV mobile web Motorola music MVNO MWC national security NDRC New Postcom Nokia Nokia Siemens Nortel NSA NTT DoCoMo OTT Pacnet Panasonic patents PCCW piracy PLA politics Potevio price war private investment Project Loon Qualcomm quantum Reach regulation Reliance Communications Ren Zhengfei Renesys RIM roaming Samsung sanctions Scania Schindler security shanzhai Sharp SKT Skype smartphones Snowden software Sony Ericsson spectrum Spreadtrum standards startups subsea cables subsidies supply chain Symbian tablets Tata Communications TCL TD LTE TD-LTE TD-SCDMA Telstra Trump Twitter urban environment USA US-China vendor financing Vitargent Vodafone New Zealand WAC WCIT Web 2.0 web freedom WeChat WhatsApp Wi-Fi Wikileaks Wimax Windows Mobile WIPO WTO Xi Guohua Xiaolingtong Xinjiang Xoom Youku YTL ZTE
« TD and FDD-LTE must combine: GSMA | Main | China’s unwieldy telcos »
Wednesday
Nov092011

Will the US let China Telecom run an MVNO?

China Telecom is planning a wireless MVNO in the US next year, Bloomberg reports.

It is already testing the service with unnamed carrier partners. The question is: will the US allow it?

We’re bound to hear noises about China Telecom as a security risk. Given that the Chinese firm will be primarily selling SIM cards to students and tourists, that is hardly relevant.

But we should expect a debate about the fairness of granting entry to a company whose own market is effectively closed.

Congress seems to have some interest in reciprocity. The Chinese Media Reciprocity bill -  which insists on a balance of state media workers between the two countries –has just hit the floor of the House.

Given the massively larger Chinese state media, that bill seems primarily about scoring a political point (some 650 Chinese state media staffers work in the USA; only two such US journalists operate in China).

But the lack of telecoms reciprocity is a real issue requiring a thought-out position.

The US allows direct foreign investment at all levels of the telecom market.

In China, not even privately-owned Chinese firms are permitted to build or operate infrastructure. 

Despite commitments China made it when entered the WTO ten years ago, foreign direct investment in telecoms is effectively ruled out.

Nominally, foreign firms may own up to 50% of value-added services providers. But as AmCham noted in its annual review in April this year, they may only partner with ventures with existing state-owned telecom providers.

“In addition, China narrowly defines VAS as value-added network service licensing. This narrow definition is not only inconsistent with accepted international practice but also limits market entry for US telecom providers.”

In August, China Telecom was also reported to have been mulling an MVNO in the UK, though nothing seems to have come of it.

It maybe that these are part of a strategic push by Chinese telcos to expand abroad, or kite-flying exercises by an assertive China, or both.

There are some signs that a push is on. BT’s Asia-Pac chief Kevin Taylor told a Hong Kong conference last week that China Mobile executives were doing the rounds in the UK “insisting that the China market is open.”

In truth, it's unlikely Washington will go along with this. What's interesting is that China Telecom appears unaware of any irony. But if it keeps this up, 'reciprocity' will become the next telecom buzzword.

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>